PATHS
OF GLORY (1957)
Director:
Stanley Kubrick
Screenplay:
Stanley Kubrick,
Calder Willingham and Jim Thompson based on the Novel by Humphrey Cobb
Of
Stanley Kubrick’s thirteen feature films, he made two war movies; one that’s
exceptionally popular, and one that a masterpiece. The popular one is “Full
Metal Jacket”; the one most people haven’t heard of is “Paths of Glory”. It’s
one of his earliest films, and yet it includes some of the most startling
battle sequences ever seen depicting World War I, especially at that time. It’s
also is the first film that clearly shows how Kubrick completely detaches
himself from his films and subjects, and finds a way to present the absurdity
of war realistically. At times, parts of this film almost seem like leftover
pieces of “Dr. Strangelove,” but it’s based on an actual incident where
generals in the French Army put soldiers on trial for cowardice after they gave
suicidal orders to capture a hill. Most of the soldiers barely get out of the
trenches, and most of them didn’t live if they did, but three soldiers are then
chosen to go on trial for cowardice. Lt. Dax, (Kirk Douglas) one of the
Colonels who happens to be the best civilian lawyer in France defends them. He
also commanded one of the troops that barely got to their own wire. The dolly
track Kubrick uses in the trenches give us an unusual great understanding of
what it was to fight and live in those trenches, a sense of how long these
trenches were and how such a stalemate of immobility defined that war. When discussing Kubrick, the most common theme that's talked about is Duality of Man, how human nature has two conflicting
sides, usually involving good and evil, usually one not realizing the other
exists (or whether one’s being good or evil).
I often joke that nobody should do duality in story unless their name is
Kubrick (You’re usually supposed/taught to write in three). Here is a film
about a good man trying to win in an evil system, that’s run by evil men. Some
more evil, others a little less evil, all except him doing what they think is
in their own best interests. Probably the most shocking scene I remember from the movie, isn't the hanging at the end, but after the trial when Lt. Dax is confronting about getting a promotion after he took down the commander, and he's surprised that he's being accused; it occurred to his rival not that he was doing this, because of the atrocities on the
Kubrick correctly and probably naturally realizes
that the deck is too stacked against him to have an ending that would end with any last-second change-of-heart of reprieve. Instead he ends with Dax listening
outside a rowdy pub as a captured German woman (Susanne Christian, Kubrick’s
future wife.) is berated and then forced to perform, singing a German song that
puts the entire pub in tears. I’m sure if I looked up the significance of the
song, I’d find some lyrical importance in the translation, but that knowledge
isn’t apparently needed to understand. Roger Ebert’s great movie review notes
Truffaut’s famous quote about no one being able to make an anti-war film, and
realizes that he said that before this film was allowed in France. (Shrugs) I'd certainly argue that it's Kubrick’s best anti-war film.
It’s also the movie that placed Kubrick among the upper elite with directors.
Him and
Douglas worked together after the film for “Spartacus,” during which they had a
falling out over how to portray Douglas’s character. It would be the last and
only time Kubrick directed a film without complete control of the production.
He shot “Paths of Glory,” just months after finishing “The Killing”, his most underrated film. After
“Spartacus,” he shot “Lolita,” very quickly, and then spent the rest of his
life taking considerable time between pictures and during shoots, perfecting
every aspect of every shot, and often times waiting years before even deciding
on a project. Few people had the kind of clout to take years on a film, even
fewer had the ability to shoot a masterpiece like “Paths of Glory,” in just a
couple months. He went for quality over his lifetime, but it strange to
recognize that he could’ve been great with quantity as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment